Nick Cannon Fired For Telling The Truth & Explanation Of American Separatism

This story is so indicative of racial policies in 2020 that I decided to touch on it again today.

Since my post on Tuesday, Nick Cannon was fired. However, the reason Cannon was fired is what interests me. If you recall, Cannon made some assertions about a small group of Jewish families controlling the world. He also claimed that he could not technically be anti-semitic because he believed blacks to be the true Semites. Let’s set these comments aside for now.

About Europeans… Whites… on the other hand, he said:

“When you have a person who has the lack of pigment, the lack of melanin that they know they will be annihilated, therefore they know that however they got the power, they have a lack of compassion, melanin comes with compassion,” Cannon said.

“Melanin comes with soul, that we call it soul, we soul brothers and sisters, that’s the melanin that connects us so the people that don’t have it, are, and I’m going to say this carefully, are a little less and where the term actually comes from, and I’m going to bring it back around to Minister Farrakhan, where they may not have the compassion,” he added.

“When they were sent to the Mountains of Caucasus, they didn’t have the power of the sun. The sun started to deteriorate them. So, they’re acting out of fear, they’re acting out of low self-esteem, they’re acting out of deficiency, so therefore the only way they can act is evil,” Cannon continued.

“They have to rob, steal, rape, kill and fight in order to survive. So these people who didn’t have what we have, and when I say ‘we,’ I speak of the melinated people, they had to be savages, they had to be barbaric because they’re in these Nordic mountains, they’re in these rough torrential environments, so they’re acting as animals, so they’re the ones closer to animals, they’re the ones that are actually the true savages,” Cannon said in the video.

But, the reason ViacomCBS decided to terminate Cannon:

While we support ongoing education and dialogue in the fight against bigotry, we are deeply troubled that Nick has failed to acknowledge or apologize for perpetuating anti-Semitism, and we are terminating our relationship with him,” the company said.

Cannon was fired for Anti-Semitism.

To summarize, Cannon was fired for telling the truth about a certain Near-Eastern tribe who make about 2% of the USA’s population.

I’ve spent the past couple of days buried in Google, going through Forbes’ recently released list of the country’s 400 richest citizens and trying to figure out who is Jewish.

This list is by no means an exact science. But those who we considered Jewish were those who were of Jewish descent or those who openly identified as Jews either personally or in their giving. There are a number of folks on this list below that we were unsure about, and they are denoted with asterisks.

Some quick stats: We are reasonably certain that 139 of the richest 400 Americans are Jewish, including 20 of the richest 50. Those top 20 control some $211.8 billion in personal wealth.

Comparing Europeans, on the other hand, to savages and animals who are a “little less” because they lack the melanin which gives them the power of compassion and leads them to become rapists and murderers?

ViacommCBS: “This is fine.”

We can reasonably assume that had Cannon not used the J-word he would have gotten off with a slap on the wrist.

To be clear, I do not care that Cannon made those comments about Europeans even though they are grossly inaccurate. I am happy to see blacks in America moving towards a position of separatism and nationalism. If all the nations within this empire can move in this direction with humility and compassion, then there might be a sliver of hope that we can all separate peacefully instead of Civil War 2.0 occurring.

As an aside and conclusion, I do want to briefly touch on what I mean by this, as many ignorant YouTube viewers seem to be confused (or deliberately misunderstanding) what I intend to communicate. I am not advocating that African-Americans return to Africa nor Hispanics to Central America nor Asians back to Asia. Unless your family has been here for less than a few generations, I am not advocating for any group’s remigration. I do advocate for the breakup of the United States along lines of identity- ethnic (more specific than racial), lingual, and religious- which probably lead to about a half-dozen different countries forming. Each one of these newly formed countries would receive an appropriate amount of territory of the existing United States.

Voluntary remigration to a person’s ancestral lands is, of course, all fine and good. Forced remigration of all people groups to their homelands is idiotic. Occasionally forced remigration will be advocated for by pseudo-nationalistic white Americans, but equally often it is made by hispanics, native Americans, and white SJW’s. It was the latter cohort that were filling up my comments on YouTube the other day.

The problems with remigration are many. First, “ancestral lands” are always defined conveniently for the person making the argument, whether it is a white person who wants to return to 1950’s America or a hispanic or native American who wants to return to 1491 America. The time frame is always arbitrary to suit one’s bias. Why don’t we go back to 12,000 BC America and just have nobody live on the continent?

That leads into my second point: Which ancestral lands should people return to? Native Americans are from Asia. Europeans are originally from Europe, but before that, they likely inhabited the Caucasus Mountains. Before that, both groups likely came from either Mesopotamia or sub-Saharan Africa. So remigrationists would need to decide if they want the current groups to kick out the Iraqis, the Congolese, or the people of Azerbaijan. After decrying colonialism for decades, I’m sure we’ll receive some logical instructions about which people group Europeans are to destroy next in this global ambition to bring people back to where they originally came from.

It’s stupid. Nations cede territory because they are too weak to defend them. That was true of the Native Americans several hundred years ago and it’s true of white Americans right now. It doesn’t mean the conqueror is morally right. It is a simple statement of facts. Conquest matters. And anyone who is retarded enough to think that we can fairly right all the wrongs of conquest throughout history can be safely ignored.

People groups should be allowed to stay in the land that they have ancestral ties to. In the context of the United States, and speaking broadly, this would apply to a small group of Asians, some Hispanics, the majority of white Americans, nearly all African-Americans, and every damn native American. They all deserve a piece of the land and they all deserve their own sovereignty. When I advocate for separatism, this is what I am arguing for.

#NickCannon #Antisemitism #ViacommCBS #Remigration #Separatism #BlackSeparatism #Nationalism #Multiculturalism #NickCannonFired

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: